Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaird, Ally
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T13:04:27Z
dc.date.available2019-03-06T13:04:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLaird, A. (2019). Quality communication: Is there a best practice for all library publishing programs? Presentation. Penn State University.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/3641
dc.description.abstractEach library publishing program differs in the amount of staff and support they have, so the amount of time available to spend overseeing each journal publication and communicating with their editors also varies. Library publishers have the additional challenge of working with both traditional publications and bespoke or otherwise explorative publications with less defined measurements of success and quality. Student-run journals or faculty journals that do not publish on a specific schedule, for example, are important for library publishing programs to support, but they pose specific challenges when it comes to editor communication and discussions of quality. At Penn State, our solution is to publish with two levels for our journal publications, a “Supported” and “Imprint” level, which allows us to differentiate between these publication types. With these levels, new journals are able to move up in support after we discern their publishing quality and timeliness. Other library programs do not differentiate between these publications and support all of them in similar ways. However, neither framework defines how often communication with each editor should be made, and thus editors are often only communicated with when a problem arises on their end, rather than with consistent follow up and guidance from the library publisher. I would like to suggest that a method of consistent communication is necessary for all types of publications, even if it the application looks different across library publishing programs with different levels of staff and support. In this round table discussion, I will facilitate the sharing of knowledge between experienced and new publishing programs regarding their communication methods for the different types of publications we support, with the goal of establishing a baseline best practice that can be adapted to work for all types of library publishers.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPenn State Universityen
dc.rightsItems in Esource are protected by copyright. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/copyright holder.en
dc.rights.urihttp://esource.dbs.ie/copyrighten
dc.subjectLibraries and publishingen
dc.subjectLibraries--Publishingen
dc.titleQuality communication: Is there a best practice for all library publishing programs?en
dc.typePresentationen
dc.rights.holderCopyright: The authoren


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record