View/Open
Date
2020
Degree
Items in eSource are protected by copyright. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/copyright holder.
Publisher
Dublin Business School
Rights
Items in eSource are protected by copyright. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/copyright holder.
Abstract
The need for an e cient fruit and vegetable identi cation and classi cation is always important
and bene cial for not only the agricultural department or food processing industry,
but also to the low level retail stores and supermarkets where fruits and vegetables are
sold. Building an e cient automated tool is very much required. In order to build this
application, an e cient and e ective classi cation model has to used, which can classify
1000's of fruits and vegetables in seconds. The purpose of this study is to nd the best
classi er model which can be used to build this automated application. While many advancements
have been made in recent years, many methods still struggle from prolonged
training and testing time and even signi cantly more number of false positives after classi-
cation. Thereby, in this paper, a review and experiments on 7 di erent available transfer
learning models such as VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet, DenseNet, InceptionV3, xception
and InceptionResNet is conducted and compared by there accuracy, precision, F1 Score
and training time, so that an e ective and e cient automated classifying system can be
built in future. Along with this, a self-designed CNN model is trained and tested. The
experiments are conducted using Fruit 360 dataset of 120 classes. Initial phase of this
study involves training the models using subset of the dataset with 21 classes. VGG16
and ResNet50 are resulted as top 2 models. Thereby, the later phase of the experiment is
conducted on these two models on the whole dataset with 120 classes. The overall results
show VGG16 is the best model with 99% of training accuracy and 95% of testing accuracy.